
There's no single answer. Here is how we usually advise clients.




A shared codebase pays off most when several of these are true.
Your customers are split between iPhone and Android and you can't launch on one and wait.
Separate iOS and Android teams would double the cost of every feature.
Forms, feeds, catalogs, bookings and dashboards are where shared code works well.
Your team knows React and TypeScript, which makes React Native a natural next step.
An MVP on both platforms tells you more than a native app on one.
An older web view app feels slow and you need a modern replacement.
A short, written comparison of React Native, Flutter and native for your specific product.
iOS and Android apps in React Native and TypeScript, sharing code and skills with your web team.
Flutter mobile app development services for products that need a custom, consistent UI on both platforms.
Swift and Kotlin code for the parts a shared framework can't handle well.
Moving old web view or Cordova-style apps to React Native or Flutter in stages.
Bringing outdated React Native or Flutter versions and libraries up to date.
Automated and manual QA on iPhones and Android devices before every release.
App Store and Google Play submissions, reviews and rollouts handled together.
React Native and Flutter for shared code, Swift and Kotlin for native modules, and a backend that serves both apps.
React
TypeScript
JavaScript
Swift
Kotlin
Node.js
PostgreSQL
AWS
GitHub ActionsYou need to reach users on both platforms quickly and learn before spending more.
Your React team and APIs can power a mobile app with less duplicated work.
One codebase keeps the cost of building and maintaining your app under control.
You've heard conflicting advice and want a clear recommendation with reasons.
A clear comparison and recommendation for your app.
Design, development and release on both stores.
Move from an old web view app to a modern one.
Plan a move to one shared codebase where it makes sense.
Catch up on skipped versions and libraries.
Camera, Bluetooth, payments and other native modules.
We review your product, team and budget and recommend React Native, Flutter or native, in writing.
Core flows and screens designed once, with platform differences planned where users expect them.
Engineers build features once for both platforms, adding native modules only where they are needed.
QA on iPhones and Android devices, so a fix on one side doesn't break the other.
App Store and Google Play submissions prepared and handled in parallel.
Framework updates, OS changes and new features after launch.
2 weeks, fixed price
Then a fixed-scope build or a dedicated team.
For new apps where the stack, scope and budget aren't settled yet.
React Native vs Flutter vs native comparison
Core flows and clickable prototype
Architecture and backend plan
Scope, timeline and cost estimate
A plan you own, whoever builds it
Engineers, QA and a lead
Monthly, team-based.
For products that already know what to build and need a team to build it.
Cross-platform and native skills in one team
Regular demos and test builds
QA on both platforms included
Store releases handled
Scale the team with your roadmap




We build with React Native, Flutter, Swift and Kotlin, so we can recommend what fits your product instead of what fits our bench.
7+ years building iOS and Android products.
70+ products launched for our clients.
Projects can start in about two weeks.
Average partnership with SMBs and product companies is 5+ years.
Design, mobile, backend and QA from one partner.
We'll recommend native if cross-platform isn't right for you.
Swift and Kotlin engineers write the native modules.
Shared code, but each platform still feels familiar.
Framework versions kept current, not left to rot.
Our engineers in Europe overlap with part of the US working day.
No sales pitch
Not sure which stack to choose?
Tell us about your app, your users and your team. We'll reply with a recommendation for React Native, Flutter or native, and why.
Related services