Native development remains a practical choice when a mobile product needs strong platform performance, direct access to device capabilities, or a separate experience for iOS and Android. The companies below range from dedicated mobile specialists with verified Swift and Kotlin expertise to broader software engineering firms that can support mobile as part of a larger product. The list distinguishes between companies with clearly documented native capabilities and those whose public positioning is broader. The numbering is used to organize the comparison rather than claim an objective ranking.
Gilzor develops mobile products for iOS and Android, with native development supported by Kotlin, Swift, Objective-C, and SwiftUI. Its mobile work covers more than the application interface: the company also handles product requirements, UX/UI, backend connections, testing, deployment, and post-release work. This makes Gilzor particularly relevant when a company needs one team to take a mobile product from an early concept through to store release.
The company also works with existing applications that need architectural changes, performance improvements, bug fixing, redesign, or further development. Alongside native engineering, React Native is available when a shared codebase makes more sense for the product.
Netguru has a well-established mobile engineering practice covering native iOS and Android as well as cross-platform development. For native products, its teams work with Swift and SwiftUI on Apple platforms and Kotlin on Android. The company can handle product discovery, mobile UX/UI, development, testing, integrations, and ongoing support rather than limiting the engagement to coding.
Its published work also shows native iOS and Android involvement in connected health products, including applications that interact with external devices through Bluetooth. That combination can make Netguru useful for mobile projects where the application must connect to a larger web, backend, or hardware ecosystem.
A-listware offers dedicated native app development for both Android and iOS. Its mobile team works with Swift, Objective-C, and Kotlin alongside cross-platform technologies such as Flutter and React Native. The company also develops software for Apple Watch, Apple TV, Android Wear, tablets, and other connected devices, which gives it a broader mobile scope than smartphone-only development.
Mobile engagements can cover consulting, product design, UX/UI, application development, integrations, QA, and continued product evolution. Published areas of mobile work include e-commerce, telemedicine, mobile banking, field services, remote-control applications, wearables, and embedded software.
Infinum supports native mobile development through separate iOS and Android technology stacks. Its Apple engineering work uses Swift and SwiftUI, while Android development centers on Kotlin and Compose. Clients can also choose Flutter, React Native, or Kotlin Multiplatform when maintaining two completely separate native applications is not necessary.
The company's mobile service covers planning, product design, frontend and backend engineering, app optimization, code refactoring, QA, maintenance, and post-launch support. Infinum reports more than 1,000 application launches and maintains offices across several European markets, including Croatia, the Netherlands, the UK, Slovenia, North Macedonia, and Montenegro.
Hedgehog lab develops native mobile applications for both iOS and Android from its headquarters in Newcastle, UK. Its mobile work covers the full product lifecycle, including discovery, UX/UI design, development, systems integration, launch, maintenance, and further product development. The company has separate iOS and Android development services rather than treating mobile solely as a cross-platform offering.
For Android projects, the team uses Kotlin and works with native Android capabilities, while its iOS service focuses on Apple's native ecosystem. Its published work includes iOS and Android products across financial services, retail, travel, transport, and health-related projects. hedgehog lab can also connect mobile applications with CRM, ERP, backend, and other business systems.
Miquido provides mobile application engineering for native and cross-platform products. Its current mobile services specifically identify Swift for iOS and Kotlin for Android, while Flutter and React Native are available for products where code sharing offers a practical advantage.
The Krakow-based company can work across discovery, architecture, UX, development, release management, modernization, and ongoing application operations. Its positioning is particularly suitable for companies that expect a mobile application to remain in active development after launch, since the service includes OS updates, SDK changes, monitoring, maintenance, and modernization of existing mobile codebases.
Itexus has a strong mobile focus within fintech, with native development capabilities for banking, digital wallets, investment products, trading applications, and other financial software. Its Android developers work with Kotlin, Java, Jetpack Compose, and the Android SDK, including native device functions such as biometrics, NFC, Bluetooth, cameras, location services, and push notifications.
The company also provides iOS development and has published examples involving dedicated iOS and Android developers working on fintech applications. Because Itexus combines mobile engineering with financial software architecture, integrations, compliance-oriented workflows, and backend development, it is particularly relevant to native apps in regulated financial environments.
21Century.Tech takes a broader software engineering approach than the dedicated mobile agencies in this list. Its current positioning centers on AI-augmented software delivery, including MVP development, full-stack features, legacy refactoring, third-party integrations, testing, documentation, and CI/CD.
The company takes a broader software development approach, with mobile work positioned as part of larger digital products rather than as a standalone native iOS or Android service. This can suit projects that combine mobile development with backend systems, integrations, cloud infrastructure, or other engineering needs. For projects that require dedicated Swift or Kotlin expertise from the outset, it is worth confirming the available mobile team and technology stack during initial discussions.
STRV is one of the more clearly native-focused firms in the comparison. Its iOS team develops applications with Swift, SwiftUI, and UIKit, while Android engineering uses Kotlin and Jetpack Compose. Native development extends beyond phones to iPadOS, watchOS, tvOS, Wear OS, Android TV, tablets, and connected-device use cases.
Its service runs from discovery and design through engineering, QA, store submission, optimization, and continued product development. STRV also publishes work covering IoT and Bluetooth integrations, which can be useful for products that depend heavily on hardware-level mobile capabilities rather than standard content or transactional interfaces.
OSKI Solutions covers both platform-specific native engineering and shared-code mobile development. Its dedicated iOS service uses Swift and SwiftUI, while native Android development is based on Kotlin and Jetpack Compose. React Native, Flutter, and .NET MAUI are available when a cross-platform architecture better suits the project.
The scope extends beyond coding to mobile UX/UI, backend APIs, authentication, device features, store submission, testing, release management, and ongoing maintenance. This gives OSKI room to work on either standalone native products or applications that connect deeply with existing enterprise systems. Its mobile team also includes engineers identified specifically with mobile roles.
Apadmi has extensive native mobile development experience across iOS and Android. Its European teams build native iOS applications in Swift and Android products using Kotlin, while Flutter is offered when one shared codebase is more appropriate. The company handles strategy, technical architecture, UX/UI, engineering, integration, QA, launch, and continuing development.
Published projects give a clearer view of its native experience. Apadmi rebuilt Qmusic with Swift for iOS and Kotlin for Android, while other work includes native applications for Domino's and CCC. Its European presence now includes Manchester and Amsterdam, with the Amsterdam operation strengthened through the integration and 2026 rebrand of PINCH.
Net Devs is primarily positioned as an enterprise software engineering company rather than a dedicated mobile app agency. Its wider work spans modern enterprise stacks, cloud platforms, AI engineering, frontend development, and software modernization. Mobile capability is nevertheless visible in the current team, which includes a dedicated Mobile Engineer.
That profile makes Net Devs suitable for projects where mobile development is part of a wider enterprise system rather than a standalone application. Its broader engineering capabilities can support mobile products alongside backend development, integrations, cloud infrastructure, and other components of a larger software environment.
Tapptitude is a product studio with direct experience building separate native iOS and Android applications. Its published work includes projects using Swift, SwiftUI, UIKit, Objective-C, Java, and Kotlin, while the company also supports Flutter and React Native for cross-platform development.
Its Imobiliare project is a useful example of the native approach: Tapptitude developed separate iOS and Android applications using technologies including Swift, Objective-C, Java, and Kotlin. Other native projects use SwiftUI and Jetpack Compose. Product strategy, UX/UI, engineering, DevOps, and testing can all sit within the same engagement, making the company suitable for businesses that want more than an outsourced coding team.
Mobian offers native app development for iOS and Android alongside its Flutter work. Its dedicated native development service focuses on platform-specific applications and positions native engineering around personalization, device access, performance, and integration with wider business systems.
The Tallinn-based studio can also support backend development, UX/UI, analytics, and ongoing product work. Published material from Mobian identifies Android development with Java and Kotlin and iOS engineering with Objective-C and Swift. This gives the company a more direct technical connection to native development than its Flutter-focused service pages alone might suggest.
SoftPro is a broader custom software company based in Warsaw, with its main service portfolio centered on software development, web applications, cloud development, AI, and Microsoft technologies. Its native-mobile positioning is narrower than that of dedicated app agencies, but the company does publish current material positioning SoftPro as a Swift development partner for projects involving native iOS frontends and enterprise backend systems.
This makes SoftPro a more natural fit for mobile projects where the iOS application needs substantial .NET, Azure, cloud, CMS, SaaS, or enterprise integration work behind it. Buyers requiring a dedicated iOS and Android agency should confirm the proposed native team, as the company's main service catalogue does not currently list a standalone mobile app development practice.
Europe has a strong mix of native mobile app development companies, from dedicated iOS and Android specialists to broader software teams that can support mobile as part of a larger digital product. The right choice depends on the project itself. Some teams are better suited to Swift and Kotlin builds with deep device integration, while others are a stronger fit for products that also need backend development, cloud infrastructure, enterprise integrations, or ongoing modernization.
Before choosing a partner, it is worth looking closely at the technologies they actually use, the type of mobile work they publish, and whether they have experience with products similar to yours. A company with clearly documented native expertise will usually be the safer option for a platform-specific build, while a broader engineering firm may make more sense when the mobile app is only one part of a more complex system.
